Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s's 79.8 overall score. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both devices in this review have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a higher amount of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A30s features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a back camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.