Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Galaxy A30s, having an 87.1 score against 79.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much newer than Galaxy A30s, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a greater display density, a bit bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy A30s has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a much better video quality, a bigger aperture and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.