Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30s has a global score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy A30s is a somewhat lighter and way thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power, although both were released only a few months apart. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give very similar OS features.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Moto G Power also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px. The Galaxy A30s has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A30s also has more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A30s. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Moto G Power features greater battery life than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity. The Moto G Power counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Moto G Power also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.