Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30s is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a 79.8 score against 77.4. The Galaxy A30s construction is incredibly newer, but incredibly thicker and somewhat heavier than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30s. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy A30s shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video and a way higher resolution back camera.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A30s features a superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.