Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has a global score of 79.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A30s is a extremely newer device than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but it's somewhat heavier and way thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A30s. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px. The Galaxy A30s captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A30s also has a camera in the back with much more MP.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A30s, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A30s counts with greater battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.