Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Galaxy A30s, with an 87 score against 79.8. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is newer than the Galaxy A30s's, but it is heavier and just a little thicker. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 876 x 2142.
Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola razr (2020) takes better videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way better video resolution and a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A30s counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.