Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30s is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 79.8 against 75.8. Galaxy A30s's body is extremely thinner and much lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were released with only 1 months difference. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A30s has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a sharper display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a quite larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A30s features a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much more MP camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features greater battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.