Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A30s, with an 83.1 score against 79.8. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is somewhat thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A30s. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a little bigger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a way higher pixels amount per inch in the display.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.