Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the Galaxy A30s's 79.8 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 is newer than Galaxy A30s, it is just a little thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a lot higher count of pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.