Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than Galaxy A30s's 79.8 score. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer, but a little bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A30s. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and Galaxy A30s has Android 11, providing some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a bit larger display, a much greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A52 5G has slightly more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.