Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than Galaxy A30s's 79.8 score. Although the Galaxy A52s is newer than Galaxy A30s, it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a way higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit bigger screen and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A52s features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.