Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is slightly better than Galaxy A30s, with an 87.7 score against 79.8. Although the Galaxy M51 is newer than the Galaxy A30s, it is notably heavier and thicker. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11.
The Galaxy M51 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy A30s and Galaxy M51 have very similar memory for games and applications, both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M51 takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 75 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.