Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s's score of 79.8. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer, but a bit thicker and extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy A30s. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11, so it provides you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a lot greater display pixel density, a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much more MP back camera and a way higher video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.