Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Galaxy A30s, having a 93.6 score against 79.8. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS. Although it's the best phone we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a just a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy A30s. The Galaxy S10 5G features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a little bit larger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a much greater pixels density.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a little better processing power than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 13% greater battery size. The Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.