Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Galaxy A30s, with a 98 score against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is thicker and notably heavier than the Galaxy A30s. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a much better 1440 x 3200px resolution, a little bigger display and a way higher pixels density.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features slightly more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features superior battery duration than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.