Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Galaxy A30s, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 79.8. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, providing a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is much newer than the Galaxy A30s's, although it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bit bigger display and a much greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.