Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 268 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the Galaxy A30s, with a score of 80.1 against 79.8. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a noticeably thicker and extremely heavier device than Galaxy A30s. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much higher number of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has 64 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better processing power than Galaxy A30s. They have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy A30s shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A30s also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.