Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting an 81 score against 79.8. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro is an extremely thicker and extremely heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A30s. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A30s. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen density and a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30s. They have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.7 camera aperture and a 25 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. Galaxy A30s features a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A30s also has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.