Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 79.8. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11, giving some extra features and a performance increase. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Samsung Galaxy A30s were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is just a bit heavier but also a little bit thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a better screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a much greater quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little bit bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Samsung Galaxy A30s features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a way lower 12 MP resolution camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better video quality.
Galaxy A30s features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.