Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s's 79.8 overall score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer and a little bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A30s. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a way better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a way greater screen pixel density and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A30s features slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A30s counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.