Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s has a general score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 global score. Galaxy A30s is a extremely newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Xperia XZs, although it is a little bit heavier. The Sony Xperia XZs has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount.
The Xperia XZs counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel density and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution. Xperia XZs has a greater camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller aperture and a much less MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video quality.
Galaxy A30s has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A30s features a much better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.