Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Blue and Green |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, with a global score of 83.8 against 79.8. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an older, just a bit thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A30s. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit better performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a way greater display pixel density. The Galaxy A30s features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A30s has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.