Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A30s's overall score of 79.8. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing here, it must be told that it's also somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.