Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31's global score of 81.3. Although the Apple iPhone X is extremely older than Samsung Galaxy A31, it's construction is thinner and a bit lighter. The iPhone X has a better performing processor than Galaxy A31, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A31 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A31, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a way better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.