Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31's 81.3 global score. The Apple iPhone XR is an older and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A31, but Apple managed to build it a little bit thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A31, although it has a little lower pixel density, a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little bit smaller screen.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A31, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Galaxy A31 features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A31 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A31 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
Galaxy A31 features a superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.