Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3's 80 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a newer device than the Google Pixel 3, but it is a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A31. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A31 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A31 has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A31 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A31 has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.