Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a's score of 78.8. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy A31 has the previous 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. Galaxy A31 is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 3a, although it's just a bit thicker and noticeably heavier.
Google Pixel 3a features a processor that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A31 one, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount per inch in the display.
Galaxy A31 features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A31 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A31 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.