Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31, with a score of 81.9 against 81.3. Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat lighter and just a little thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A31, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A31 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A31 has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.