Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than Galaxy A31, with a score of 89 against 81.3. Google Pixel 5's body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A31, although they were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixel density.
Galaxy A31 features a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A31 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.