Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A31 has 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. Although the Galaxy A31 is heavier than HTC One M9, it's thinner and incredibly newer.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A31, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an extra graphics processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count per display inch.
The Galaxy A31 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A31 features a slightly better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light environments and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.