Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's score of 77. The Galaxy A31 construction is newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it is a bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Galaxy A31 has just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A31 also has a higher number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy A31 counts with a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
HTC U Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A31, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A31 features a very superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.