Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, with an 81.3 score against 77. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Galaxy A31 has older 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Although Galaxy A31 is newer than LG G7 Fit, it is a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a bit better CPU than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a greater number of cores. The LG G7 Fit features a sharper display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A31 takes much better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG G7 Fit has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A31 features a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.