Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is slightly better than the Galaxy A31, having an 85.4 score against 81.3. The LG K92 construction is a bit thinner but just a bit heavier than Galaxy A31, and both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The LG K92 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG K92 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A31 features a little bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a bit greater pixel count in each display inch.
The LG K92 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size, the LG K92 also has a lot better video quality, a much better 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments.
The LG K92 features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A31 has superior battery life than LG K92, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.