Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the LG Q70's 77.9 general score. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should provide identical OS features. Although Samsung Galaxy A31 and LG Q70 were released only 0 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A31 construction is a little lighter but a little bit thicker.
The Galaxy A31 has a little sharper display than LG Q70, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A31 also has a little bit better number of pixels per inch of screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The LG Q70 counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Q70 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A31 and LG Q70 both have quite similar processors, both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A31 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy A31 has greater battery life than LG Q70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.