Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy A31, getting a score of 82.5 against 81.3. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, so it provides you lots of additional features. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is much older than Galaxy A31, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher display density. LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A31 has a way better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy A31 has a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.