Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31's 81.3 score. The LG V35 ThinQ body is somewhat thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy A31, despite of the fact that it was released around 23 months before. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A31 has a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. Samsung Galaxy A31 features a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and videos and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.