Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 score. Samsung Galaxy A31 is a newer phone than LG V40 ThinQ, but it's a little bit heavier and thicker. Both devices in this comparison use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A31, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features just a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a much smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a much better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.