Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A31's 81.3 general score. Even being the best in this comparison review, the LG V60 ThinQ construction is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A31. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version while Galaxy A31 has Android 10, counting with some extra features and some performance improvements.
LG V60 ThinQ has a display that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A31's screen, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy A31's battery performance. Galaxy A31 has a slightly better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, a much worse 1920x1080 video resolution, a tinier back camera sensor providing a worse image quality and a way worse 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.