Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.53 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), getting an 81.3 score against 78.9. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A31 has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A31 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with more MP.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because it has a 9 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.