Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-27 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Even though the Galaxy A31 is a lot newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Galaxy A31 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A31 also has 4 more CPU cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A31 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a camera with much more MP. The Moto Z Force counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A31, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A31 features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.