Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action, getting a score of 81.3 against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy A31 body is just a bit thinner but just a little heavier than the Motorola One Action, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Motorola One Action features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution and a little bit better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
Motorola One Action features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A31. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a much better battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A31 takes much better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.