Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A31's score of 81.3. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) and the Galaxy A31 were only released with a few months difference, the Motorola razr (2020) design is a little bit heavier but a bit thinner than the Galaxy A31. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, providing some nice extra features.
Galaxy A31 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola razr (2020) features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a really longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% larger battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way higher (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.