Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A31 has an older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both were released with only 6 months difference.
The Galaxy A31 and the nubia Red Magic 3S both feature really similar displays, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger screen. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery life is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A31. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and the same resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.