Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a general score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A31's global score of 81.3. Even being the best we compare here, OPPO Find X2 Pro's design is just a little bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy A31. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a greater display pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a bit bigger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos and a lot higher video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.