Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Galaxy A31, with a general score of 91.1 against 81.3. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10, giving a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A31's, but it's just a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy A31 and the Galaxy A52s both have similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52s has a just a bit inferior pixel quantity per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bigger display. Galaxy A52s features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A52s has a bit better processor than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52s takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A31, because it has a back camera with much more megapixels, a way better 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.