Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A31, with a 90.8 score against 81.3. The Galaxy Note 20 design is a little bit thinner but just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A31, and they were only released with a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A31 and Galaxy Note 20 have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit worse display pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A31 has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations and a tinier camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with higher video frame rates and a way better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A31 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.