Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A31, having an 86.3 score against 81.3. Even though the Galaxy S10e is older than the Samsung Galaxy A31, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. Galaxy S10e features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S10e has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10e has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A31 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has worse video frame rates and a lot smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.