Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A31, having a 98 score against 81.3. These devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features and enhanced performance. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A31.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A31, because it has a quite better screen pixel density, a little bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A31, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better resolution back camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a battery life that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A31's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.