Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A31's score of 81.3. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a little lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A31. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features and better performance.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels count per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a much larger camera sensor, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture. The Galaxy A31 features a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A31 has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.