Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. The Samsung Galaxy A31 construction is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it's somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A31, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A31 features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A31 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger camera aperture.
The Galaxy A31 features a way better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.